Skip to main content


Analysis and Biblical SupportThe parable of the love of the father, or lost son or what we have come to know as the parable of the prodigal son, is arguably a classical representation of the gospel message – the message of salvation. From the story, however, we can infer that salvation is not limited to just accepting Jesus Christ and receiving eternal life. Both young men in the story were called sons. This is indicative of how the father looks at all of humanity. Everyone bears His image as we see from Genesis 1:26-27. Willcock (1978) alludes to this in his claim that the parable represents not men but man; not grouping but humanity as a whole. We are all equal in His sight. This clears up any sense of privilege that, as humans, we may tend to think we have over another. The father’s love is universal, it is all encompassing (John 3:16-17).

Moreover, this love is given without condition. It is independent of human actions and human volition. This is demonstrated in the father’s response to the son who rebels against his authority – a son who could not wait until his father’s death to possess what was his but took that which was to be given to him sometime later (disrupting order and ignoring the father’s will) and squandered it. His actions made him unworthy and he recognised that himself when he realised the position he had found himself in after leaving home. However, upon return, he found out that the father did not share his opinion. He father did not look at his present condition of being a rebel and sinner; an object of ostracism and punishment but he gave him back his personhood (a son). The scripture teaches us this principle in the book of Romans. Paul says that God (The Father) demonstrates his love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). While lost and far away from home, the father still pursues us; he runs after us and accepts us as the sons that we are; not servants ( as the “lost” son thought was his only deserved position by virtue of his actions). There is nothing that anyone can do that can make God love him more than he already does or any less.

Additionally, the narrative tells of the younger son reaching as far as being among pigs. For Jews, this is more than sacrilegious. Jews dealt with nothing unclean because it, in turn, made them ceremonially unclean. They cannot fathom even associating with someone like that, much more God. However, Jesus shows how God is willing to embrace such a person in the father’s reaction to a returning son. The holy God of the universe chooses to become immanent among sinful mankind by embracing him; His justice finding expression in mercy and grace.

Further to, the narrative exposes the heart of the older brother towards his father. Angry at his father for appearing unjust, he talks about his own righteousness, making him worthy of more love than the other brother. Willcock says that this represents those who trust in themselves. Not only the fact that we are sons, make us equal before God but the reality of our humanity also equalises us before Him. Sin is an inherent quality in all of fallen humanity but the father’s love is extended towards all; those who wilfully reject his authority and walk away (younger son) as well as those who come to him but still despise his authority and sovereignty ( the older son). While in the immediate context, the parable may be speaking to the equality among Jews and Gentiles, it transcends racial and religious boundaries and tells a story of the equality among all of humanity because we all bear the “Imago Dei”.

But I also want to pay attention to the wider narrative of which this portion is a part. The entire narrative deals with lost things: a lost coin, a lost sheep and a lost son. Each, in varying stage of “lostness”. The coin was lost, did not know it was lost and was unable to find its way home so the woman relentlessly searched for that coin. The value which is insinuated in the passage to be miniscule but it was more about what it was worth to the woman that drove her to seek after it. The sheep was lost, knew it was lost but could not find its way home. In safety, the shepherd left the other sheep and went in pursuit of that lost sheep; again, placing value on the minority. Finally, there is a lost son who knew he was lost and was able to find his way home so when he returned what he found was a father running to him with arms wide open, in anticipation of his son’s return. Though we speak of lostness in the passage, the bigger story is not the lostness (how the passage is viewed through Jewish/human eyes) but the loving response of those who could not part with that which was considered “lost”.


Consequently, we must consider the value of this wonderful narrative in how we relate to people, primarily those who feel like and are considered outcasts, insignificant or rejects as well as how we must now present and represent the Gospel. How do we treat those who are mentally insane, in light of this scripture? How do we treat those who do not hold our faith (Christianity)? How do we accept those who are morally deviant: lesbians, gays, commercial sex workers, adulterers, murderers, and the person who processes his /her hair or wears jewellery…?
As we consider the purpose behind the author’s message we must bring this narrative into our modern day realities and more specifically, our Jamaican context. This gospel was written by one who was possibly marginalised because of his race/nationality. He picks up on Jesus’ story of these two sons and father and highlights the unconditional love shown towards the one who should automatically be undeserving of it. In that parable, Luke can situate himself and all the other gentiles to whom he, primarily, wrote. He communicates that same message to us today. We have a responsibility of taking the unconditional love of God to those who need it most. Does this make the older son less loved or less important? Certainly not! Does this make religious persons less important in God’s eyes? No! It only means that this Gospel that tells of God’s unconditional love is important to those who find themselves on the outside of religion and religious practices.
Furthermore in our interaction with people we must remember that each person represent God’s image and is deserving of His love and our respect. If we are to truly represent God and Jesus then we must see all men as God sees them. Philippians 2:1-7 tells of that imitation of Christ’s humility and value of humanity. As we share the message of salvation we must also do what we can to restore the personhood of those we serve. The father clothed the son who came to him in rags. He did not just accept as a son and say you are forgiven. He gave his son a different standard of life to that he knew while he was away from his home (and his father). Granted the abundant life is what he was meant to enjoy; nothing missing, nothing lacking. This is not a prosperity gospel message but it picks up on James discourse on faith that is worth recognition (James 2:14-25).


Codet, Frederic L. Commentary on Luke.1981.Kegrel Publications. United States of America.

Bock, Darrell, L.1994.Luke 1:1-9:50.Baker Book House Company.United States of America.

Hendriksen, William. 1978. New Testament Commentary: Luke. The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh.

Van Doran, Williams,H.Gospel of Luke.1981. Kegrel Publications. United States of America.

Kaiser, Walters, C, Jr, Silva, Mois`es.2007. Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics. Zondervan. United States of America

Willcock, Rev.J. 1978. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary. Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

The NIV Rainbow Study Bible


  1. this is a very stirring message Marcus it touched the core of my being. what is so difficult is trying to remain humble to execute what is require of us. What u suggested is not easy to do

  2. Thank You for your feedback. I hope that such stirring will lead you into a changed attitude toward people who are "different" and perhaps lead you into reaching out to them.
    Let me put a question to you. If this is part of the Christian faith and it cannot pass the test of practice, then is the Christian faith worth its existence or is it that is not convenient for Christians to do this because hanging on to traditional and arcaic practices is more important for them to save face than to stand for God.

  3. while it good 4 a man to be philanthropist, what can one do when there is inadequate or sometime no resources. Words alone as u inferred is insufficient in helping but how does one help the destitute hen they themselves are lacking

  4. Well, MrBowley, by calling other people's attention to their plight. Advocacy is always a good place to start. It does not ONLY take cash to care. You can also offer kind words and if it is a case where there is a material need, you may want to help "beg" on their behalf... Be Their voice. I hope these are practical enough ways, Sir...

  5. christian faith should pass the test of practice. if it is not practical whats the sense? i do agree that we have the proclivity to hold on to tradition and make void the word of God through these practices. i am not trying to justify any of these archaic practice but the truth about the matter Marcus is that what has been practice over the years does not take one night or day to get rid of. So the point is this what you have articulated is true but it is challenging.

  6. Point taken. Each of us, however, has a responsibility to aggressively pursue, encourage and become the change that we want to see. Have you begun to engage some of your Christian friends around such change? Or even asking them to read this blog for example and hear what their thoughts are or are you a "closeted" convert? lol

  7. lol trust me bro has i learn i practice look on my facebook profile i have a link of ur blog on it


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


"They need to get their priority in order."

"They do not have money to send their children to school but they have time to put in hairstyle!"

"I am not sorry for them at all. They too wicked."

These are among the value statements we make against people living in economically depressed conditions. We speak with such contempt when it comes to the poor and how they "adjust their priorities." We, with our well-thinking selves, impose upon those we presume ourselves to know better than, a set of values and priorities we "know" to be good for them, so that they can get their lives in "order".

It was from this position of "awokeness" and perhaps being "well-intentioned", then President of the West Jamaica Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Pastor Glen Samuels, spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast in 2016. He did so to great chorus, as his audience erupted in laughter and loud applause, approving what was a v…

The Wicked Woman We Love to Hate!

Choose a Caribbean island - any one. There's a mother who's just beat her child with the first thing that her hands fall on. The Caribbean is inundated with narratives of mothers who dare not spare the rod and spoil the child - mothers who dig up ants nest and put their child to kneel in it, on a grater with their hands tied behind their back; mothers who use a hot iron to burn the hand of their thieving child; mothers who go into schools to box up the disrespectful child for answering back teacher and bringing shame to her name.
These are the things that Caribbean mothers do. They do this, not necessarily because they are wicked, but in the name of discipline.

We are a people who have learned violence. It's become part of our social DNA. Our parents learned that violence was how transgressors are taught to do better and behave better. They learned such violence from their parents, and their parents from theirs and their parents from the plantation. The whip is what we le…


Social Media, and in particular twitter, has become a space for spewing caustic and vitriolic effluent at people with whom we disagree. I am sometimes amazed at how people feel so empowered and emboldened sitting behind a screen to descend into the bowels of utter nastiness to express dissent to something that someone else posted. It is worse now that we have 280 characters instead of 140. It means that the nastiness is times two. But social media can be and has been used as a source of good. I have been the beneficiary of deep friendships and formed a formidable network of people who have supported and pushed me along in my professional and personal life.Yet, we do not hear many stories about the power and reach of social media. In this post, I want to speak about a quiet Superhero that I encountered on social media.

I had been working in three vulnerable communities in the last couple of years on a urban disaster risk reduction project being implemented by Habitat for Humanity Jamai…