Skip to main content

Capital Punishment: A Solution to Jamaica's Crime Situation?

The debate surrounding capital punishment is quite pertinent and poignant that at this time in Jamaica’s history. We have seen an upsurge in violent crimes, positioning Jamaica as the murder capital of the world. There is a serious need to arrest this monster of violence that holds our nation at ransom. The retention of capital punishment seems to be best possible solution for many. I am unequivocally opposed to the practice:

1. The church to which I belong seems to be in support of capital punishment because of the tyranny of those miscreants who perpetrate those crimes and because it is believed that when someone disrespects the sanctity of life by taking it, then the Bible supports if their life is taken in return. Capital punishment, according to the church can be traced in the Bible. The Old Testament gives room for capital punishment when the law was broken. The state has the power to execute justice and it does not tantamount to murder, in the case of a civilian taking the life of another.

2. Even though the church’s stance may seem justifiable and supposedly supported by scripture, I am vehemently against capital punishment because of many reasons including my treatment with biblical evidence that seems to present counter arguments for capital punishment as well as ethical and legal ramifications.

3. Though many Bible carrying Christians seem to refer to verses in the Bible to support the cruelty of capital punishment, internal biblical evidence seems to convey a message of forgiveness and restitution more than the “eye for an eye” concept. In fact the same cluster of laws to which they refer to justify capital punishment included ceremonial laws, moral laws and religious laws. Persons could face the death penalty for things like bearing false witness or sexual acts that were inconsistent with the beliefs of the time. Can you imagine if the death penalty was retained for the same purpose and intent that it was upheld in Old Testament? Then womanizers, thieves, fornicators and adulterers would be punished by death. What we have posited, therefore, in the Old Testament; a different period and culture from our own, is descriptive of a practice rather than a prescription of the practice. Furthermore, the overarching theme of the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, seems to be one of forgiveness and restitution. Though the penalty for eating of the tree knowledge of good and of evil was death, God himself, after giving the two convicted felons a hearing, sought to dispense grace by the slaying of the animals to make clothing for the two. The shedding of blood is symbolic of the shedding of the blood that is necessary for salvation and forgiveness. Jesus himself condemned the Mosaic law that is found in Leviticus 24:19-20: If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the other, so he is to be injured. He said in Matthew 5:38–39: You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. Jesus said he fulfilled the requirements of the Law in Matthew 5:17. It means that having fulfilled the requirements of the law there remains no power in the letter of the Law to condemn anyone (Galatians 3:19-25). Furthermore, the conversion of the Apostle Paul serves as a testament of God’s interest in taking the most heinous of criminals and transforming them. Those who are unyielding, God himself promised to avenge (Romans 12:17-21). These may be difficult sayings in scripture to accept, necessarily because our human tendency is to accord evil, evil recompense. That is our view of justice but according to God we must do the opposite hence the Bible as a whole and the New Testament in particular cannot support capital punishment.

4. I think that the recommencement of capital punishment in Jamaica is an ethical and spiritual indictment on the Jamaican society and judicial system. Firstly, not even the state has the right to disregard the sanctity of life. If the rational for capital punishment remains that life had been disrespected then it is somewhat antithetical to disrespect life in the dispensation of justice. Secondly, the practice goes against the biblical teachings of forgiveness and restitution. Forgiveness and restitution are not enemies of justice. They do not ignore the crime that has been committed they hold the perpetrators accountable but make effort to reform and rehabilitate. In fact this may be a more just alternative when we consider the greatly corrupt justice system that we have in Jamaica. It is very likely that innocent people are convicted and executed. We have had police officers confessing to fabricating evidence or poor, alleged criminals being unable to afford proper legal representation is another factor that compromises the dispensing of justice.

5. Capital punishment does not deter criminals. An effective justice system, where criminals get caught does. Crime will continue to increase in the presence of capital punishment if the system itself is not effective in capturing criminals. Capital punishment has not deterred murderers in Trinidad. In fact there has been an increase in the crime of murder in the presence of that law and the practice itself.

6. The absence of Capital punishment in Jamaica does not necessarily contribute to the crime of murder. On the contrary, I believe the lion’s share must be attributed to: perversion of the justice system, the advent of relativism and erosion of family values and guidance, the apathy of the church, the victimization of the poor by the political directorate and the irresponsibility of the media have all contributed to the problem of murder in Jamaica.

7. There is no justification for capital punishment. None! It is my impression that we make no provision in our justice system for rehabilitation and reform. There must be a reason for the crimes perpetrated. Has anyone researched the reasons and sought to facilitate behavioural change? Instead there is the concept of lock them away and throw the keys away or even more draconian measures like kill them.

8. The Bible does not contradict itself on capital punishment. Our varying interpretations are what become contradictory. There is information in the Bible that is descriptive rather than prescriptive. When that which is descriptive is made to be prescriptive, then there is an apparent contradiction. To avoid this contradiction, one has to compare their interpretation of that particular text with the wider context of biblical teaching. The rules to biblical hermeneutics (interpretation) include: context, context, context, and context (cultural context, historical/situational context, literary context, grammatical structure of the text). Should this scientific approach of interpretation be effected, then one should not arrive at so many contradictions.


  1. Albert R. WilliamsApril 1, 2011 at 4:08 PM

    Can I tell you how much I love your mind? Well, I love your mind. I was all for capital punishment until I did a research in 6th form for my SBA and I realize that capital punishment is nothing more than state endorsed murder. I agree with all the point u outlined above. I think we are desperate for a solution to the murder rate and think this irrational choice is the best bet.

  2. Thank you Albert... When man becomes desperate/passionate, reason becomes the slave to his passion (David Hume), hence his irrational thought patterns. We cannot continue to make decisions of out panic, desperation or fear. We have to continue to seek the highest good of all our people so that we ensure that we are not reacting to crime all the time but we are proactive; preventing and mitigating the occurrence of crime, particularly those that end in murder. Thanks for your contribution.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


"They need to get their priority in order."

"They do not have money to send their children to school but they have time to put in hairstyle!"

"I am not sorry for them at all. They too wicked."

These are among the value statements we make against people living in economically depressed conditions. We speak with such contempt when it comes to the poor and how they "adjust their priorities." We, with our well-thinking selves, impose upon those we presume ourselves to know better than, a set of values and priorities we "know" to be good for them, so that they can get their lives in "order".

It was from this position of "awokeness" and perhaps being "well-intentioned", then President of the West Jamaica Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Pastor Glen Samuels, spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast in 2016. He did so to great chorus, as his audience erupted in laughter and loud applause, approving what was a v…

The Wicked Woman We Love to Hate!

Choose a Caribbean island - any one. There's a mother who's just beat her child with the first thing that her hands fall on. The Caribbean is inundated with narratives of mothers who dare not spare the rod and spoil the child - mothers who dig up ants nest and put their child to kneel in it, on a grater with their hands tied behind their back; mothers who use a hot iron to burn the hand of their thieving child; mothers who go into schools to box up the disrespectful child for answering back teacher and bringing shame to her name.
These are the things that Caribbean mothers do. They do this, not necessarily because they are wicked, but in the name of discipline.

We are a people who have learned violence. It's become part of our social DNA. Our parents learned that violence was how transgressors are taught to do better and behave better. They learned such violence from their parents, and their parents from theirs and their parents from the plantation. The whip is what we le…


Social Media, and in particular twitter, has become a space for spewing caustic and vitriolic effluent at people with whom we disagree. I am sometimes amazed at how people feel so empowered and emboldened sitting behind a screen to descend into the bowels of utter nastiness to express dissent to something that someone else posted. It is worse now that we have 280 characters instead of 140. It means that the nastiness is times two. But social media can be and has been used as a source of good. I have been the beneficiary of deep friendships and formed a formidable network of people who have supported and pushed me along in my professional and personal life.Yet, we do not hear many stories about the power and reach of social media. In this post, I want to speak about a quiet Superhero that I encountered on social media.

I had been working in three vulnerable communities in the last couple of years on a urban disaster risk reduction project being implemented by Habitat for Humanity Jamai…